So I was looking at Insight, wasting time as usual when I started to check out the exchange records for all LCs in the US. It seems from 1998-2003, there was a very large amount of exchange done with extremely reputable clients. I'm not sure if the outsourcing trend has destroyed AIESEC's market in the US or if the debt AIESEC US went through rendered us unable to deliver on these accounts but a few things are clear. AIESEC US LCs are weaker in many ways than they were three to four years ago. The demand or the sales competencies have significantly decreased over time, and out partnership base has dwindled.
My recommendation is that al LCs research what they were a few years ago and contact former partners. They invested in us once and they are more likely to do it again. This seems more effective than starting from scratch. If only insight was around when Cornell was opened before.
I also think AIESEC US needs to what an LC is more concretely because I sense that we only have a few true LCs and there are many which are wasting resources and not delivering on the brand promise. Harsh I know, but there are so many remanants of the past struggling to stay alive today. Maybe it makes more sense to build from a strong foundation rather than repairing the damage of debt and downfall.
Ponder.